After watching Kamala Harris’ acceptance speech last night, the choice between the Republican and Democratic presidential candidates comes down to your gut and aversion.
Or rather, who is less averse.
Do you like open sores or do you prefer making a cut to get to the disease?
Are you more like an ER doc putting out fires or are you more temperate like an oncologist who treats the decay from within?
Donald Trump is the…
Related posts:
Aug. 6 Primary- 51 votes separating Upthegrove from Kuehl Pederson for Public Lands Commissioner
Decoding the Roanoke Conference: 10 Insights into Washington’s Conservative Movement
He Said ‘Prove Me Wrong.’ Someone Shot Him Instead
Over 700 Protesters Expected at ‘No Kings’ Rally on Saturday in Twisp
It is clear that both candidates have their moral flaws. That should be nothing new as most of Congress has the same issue as do politicians in Washington State. We can all be adverse over a candidate’s moral failure and hold our nose as we vote. But in doing so we miss the consequences as well as our responsibility to choose which candidate will make our country better off and heading in a better direction as a result of their term in office. The choice is between the candidate that will continue the failed policies of the Biden administration verse one that will seek to remedy many of the problems created. Your choice needs to be based on a good evaluation of the policies each candidate represents.